The sweet, wedded rape of chance, meaning
and definitions torn apart…assuages past preferences
to light aloud the demeaning of sanctity & sacred societal scaffolding.
Blight & honed, via addendums, to wit we ask [askew & skewered].
Meanings have reasonably purposed definitions…a structure
behind the syntax. [And] more than a broad-based meta-narrative could exhume,
a less-than-placid cacophony will up-endingly deplete reserves
of patience kept @ bay for [the sake of] civility.
So, back-breaking straws aside, what should be our response?
Soft, answerable love-thine enemy nostalgia? An Inside-Baseball [batter-up!]
approach to the [re]negotiation of transcendent terminology?
Forthridden & objective[o]lity such says-spoken examplia moderative[ation]
negates culminated & culturally obligatory swansongsinging…
None-of-it shall I now, or retroactively, embrace. The path leads to cultural and
individual deestruction (former without/latter within).
When definitions & dialogues change, so do inevitable outcomes. Bludgeon it now
or live with its shackles, fettered round & about your feet, neck & hands…
…but forget ye the tongue* (for that’s what begun it all in the first [foremost?] place).
*It bled your heart.